SofTeCode Blogs

One Place for all Tech News and Support

strategy of Innovation Projects

3 min read
Innovation Projects

image by unsplash


How to Kill Innovation Projects

Which of those is that the most vital skill for a pacesetter of innovation?

  • Setting the vision, goals and metrics
  • Generation of great ideas
  • Selection of the simplest ideas
  • Starting exploration projects
  • taking note of customer feedback
  • Managing the portfolio and stage-gates
  • Gaining support and resources from other departments
  • Killing the weaker projects
  • Launching new products or services
  • Celebrating success

They are all important but I think that the foremost vital is #8 – the power to exterminate the weaker projects. Generating good proposals for innovative products and services is fairly easy. Starting evaluation projects is harder but you would like to start out many because no-one knows which can succeed. If you begin 20 projects it’s likely that you simply are getting to need to eliminate a minimum of 17 or 18 of them. Typically fewer than 15% of trials make it through to final product launch. So it’s crucial to get rid of the losers as soon as possible so on release vital resources for the potential winners. you’ve got to kill tons of projects early otherwise you are swamped. But how does one choose which of them to cull?

The normal thanks to eliminating projects is thru applying strict criteria at each of the gates within the stage-gate process before further funding is allocated. But this will be slow and mechanistic so faster and better decisions are often needed.

Here are some bad reasons to kill Innovation projects. the highest executive(s) believes:

  1. Customers won’t love it
  2. We cannot crack the technology
  3. We cannot make money doing this
  4. The competition has a far better offering
  5. It doesn’t meet a true customer need
  6. It doesn’t fit with our strategy and direction

Here are some good reasons to kill Innovation projects. After bringing a protoype before some customers we discovered that:

  1. Customers didn’t love it
  2. We couldn’t crack the technology
  3. We cannot make money doing this
  4. The competition has a far better offering
  5. It doesn’t meet a true customer need

Note that the primary five items in each list are essentially equivalent. what’s the difference? the primary list is predicated on opinion. The second list is predicated on evidence. The opinions of senior executives are dangerous because they think they’re experts. But it’s extremely hard to understand beforehand which innovations will really strike a chord. it’s best to check the thought. once you test you get hard evidence of what’s likely to succeed or fail. Furthermore you get valuable feedback for improvements. fairly often when customers see the prototype they’re going to say, ‘I don’t like this but I do like that. And if you changed it during this way it might be better.’ they create insightful suggestions which inform your decision. The result’s that the merchandise which finally makes it plug is sort of different from the primary prototype which was trialled.

Finally don’t kill a project because it doesn’t fit together with your current strategy and portfolio. If customers like it and you’ll build it and you’ll make money with it then diversify, be bold and build it.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Give your views

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.